I am VERY TIRED. Still drained from the latest bout of illness, and not a little exhausted by my Pre-Guest Cleaning (girlfriend comes Sunday--I'm excited, a touch nervous, and frantically tidying things) and running around tonight, despite my ingestion of a 1) Java Monster, and 2) Caramel Mocha Chiller (tm, Sonic). Neither of which made me feel as if I had live hamsters who'd just been bitten by cocaine-addicted scorpions surging through my very veins, despite the adverts' implications and my own over-enthusiastic expectations. Energy drinks of the world: where are my hamsters with second hand substance abuse issues? Where?
ON TO THE SCI-FI RAMBLING.
Like everyone else in the world, the popular resurgence of Star Trek has drawn me back to my stream of origin a sci-fi salmon. In the past weeks I've managed to re-watch nearly all of ST:TOS.
It always bothers me that Other Planets have monolithic cultures, as if cultural globalization has just swallowed them as part of their evolutionary process. Initially, I assume a vastly alien culture would appear uniform by virtue of the great differences that must exist between products of entirely disparate cultural origins. But as we get to know a species over centuries, shouldn't some distinction become apparent between, say, Vulcans from different hemispheres? Betazoids of different religions?
Re: Vulcans, it sometimes seems as if we only ever come in contact with members of the highest class. In the original series we see Spock's marriage: hyper-traditional and redolent of privilege. In the later-made and earlier-set Enterprise we see another much like it.
Star Trek is big on advanced societies being inherently classless. Whether or not this is naive, and if wealth might be supplanted as the basis of such a hierarchical system by privilege based on traditional prerogatives, what might be seen as a meritocracy, or a valuation based on an individual or family's perceived contribution to society, can be laid aside for now. Suffice it to say that kibbutzniks traditionally wield a numerically disproportionate political power in the Israeli Knesset, as do Ashkenazim in Israeli politics, without the benefit of necessarily being more monied--so there's certainly precedent.
The Western perception of Japan is that everyone knows how to run a tea ceremony and cavorts with geishas. These are historically very upper-class activities, built around having the leisure time necessary to develop and devote to them. Vulcan attitudes and mental disciplines (meditation, philosophical education, occasional retreats into monasticism), at least according to human historical tradition, smack of the money necessary to devote to a fetishization of an ironically complicated scholasticism-cum-Buddhist-esque simplicity.
Also, there could be a wicked underlying complacency to stoicism--its easier to be untroubled, to consider emotional outbursts gauche, if you're entitled enough to make most worry unnecessary?
As this culture progressed, did identifiable upper class behaviors become the signifiers of Vulcan-ness? There's something disquieting about the loss of those other classes' cultural identities, even as the loss of ethnic identities is a sad end to what we have to assume was initially a plurality of experiences. The ways and views of the middle and lower classes seem to have been lost, either as these classes gained the resources that enabled mobility and imitative behavior (or is this romanticizing their difficulties?), in some reaction to contact with the larger galaxy, or by virtue of a wholesale trend towards homoginization.
This always bothers me about Doctor Who, as well, re: the 'Gallifreyans' vs. 'Time Lords' nomenclature thing. I have to say I much prefer it if the appellation 'Time Lord' is synonymous with 'Gallifreyan,' rather than handed out only to Academy graduates, nobles, or the somehow /specially/ intellectually gifted in Gallifreyan society. I think I find the Doctor running away from a species-wide elitism more resonant? I want 'Come now, we're both Time Lords' to be a call to something more fundamental and significant than 'help a brother out, we both went to Eton.' My general squick's more complicated than that, but I'm not sure how to parse and articulate it. I just wholesale /prefer/ 'Time Lord' simply meaning Gallifreyan.
Spock's class status is revealed rather slowly--we learn that he's from a /very/ well-placed family only in second season's Amok Time when Kirk and McCoy notice that a reactionary Vulcan politician of interplanetary renown is officiating at Spock's wedding, and comment on it. Spock's in no position at that point to observe or react to their surprise. Later we meet a prominent Vulcan ambassador, and Kirk is surprised that the ambassador and his human wife are Spock's parents. It's interesting that Spock's human mother and Nurse Chapel both imply that for all the touted superiority of their emotional stoicism, Vulcans have some expectations of submissiveness from their wives that humans typically find sexist or strange. This isn't mentioned again in later encounters with the species, perhaps thought better of by later writers.
From a social sciences perspective, the dragging out the 'tortured half-breed' trope with Spock's a bit of a backward-looking step from a show that so wanted to be progressive.
As a parting non sequitur, I'm so, so tired of chasing bats out of the kitchen. This is like the fourth this summer? We have to be /doing/ something different to attract them, or their diminishing habitat is pushing them further into the city than I've ever seen. But screw environmental worries: damn bats! All up in my kitchen! Confounding the Schnoodle! ...I'm sorry, I have to go now and found a prog rock group, 'Confounding the Schnoodle.' Excuse me. I'll be back later. With Grammies.
ON TO THE SCI-FI RAMBLING.
Like everyone else in the world, the popular resurgence of Star Trek has drawn me back to my stream of origin a sci-fi salmon. In the past weeks I've managed to re-watch nearly all of ST:TOS.
It always bothers me that Other Planets have monolithic cultures, as if cultural globalization has just swallowed them as part of their evolutionary process. Initially, I assume a vastly alien culture would appear uniform by virtue of the great differences that must exist between products of entirely disparate cultural origins. But as we get to know a species over centuries, shouldn't some distinction become apparent between, say, Vulcans from different hemispheres? Betazoids of different religions?
Re: Vulcans, it sometimes seems as if we only ever come in contact with members of the highest class. In the original series we see Spock's marriage: hyper-traditional and redolent of privilege. In the later-made and earlier-set Enterprise we see another much like it.
Star Trek is big on advanced societies being inherently classless. Whether or not this is naive, and if wealth might be supplanted as the basis of such a hierarchical system by privilege based on traditional prerogatives, what might be seen as a meritocracy, or a valuation based on an individual or family's perceived contribution to society, can be laid aside for now. Suffice it to say that kibbutzniks traditionally wield a numerically disproportionate political power in the Israeli Knesset, as do Ashkenazim in Israeli politics, without the benefit of necessarily being more monied--so there's certainly precedent.
The Western perception of Japan is that everyone knows how to run a tea ceremony and cavorts with geishas. These are historically very upper-class activities, built around having the leisure time necessary to develop and devote to them. Vulcan attitudes and mental disciplines (meditation, philosophical education, occasional retreats into monasticism), at least according to human historical tradition, smack of the money necessary to devote to a fetishization of an ironically complicated scholasticism-cum-Buddhist-esque simplicity.
Also, there could be a wicked underlying complacency to stoicism--its easier to be untroubled, to consider emotional outbursts gauche, if you're entitled enough to make most worry unnecessary?
As this culture progressed, did identifiable upper class behaviors become the signifiers of Vulcan-ness? There's something disquieting about the loss of those other classes' cultural identities, even as the loss of ethnic identities is a sad end to what we have to assume was initially a plurality of experiences. The ways and views of the middle and lower classes seem to have been lost, either as these classes gained the resources that enabled mobility and imitative behavior (or is this romanticizing their difficulties?), in some reaction to contact with the larger galaxy, or by virtue of a wholesale trend towards homoginization.
This always bothers me about Doctor Who, as well, re: the 'Gallifreyans' vs. 'Time Lords' nomenclature thing. I have to say I much prefer it if the appellation 'Time Lord' is synonymous with 'Gallifreyan,' rather than handed out only to Academy graduates, nobles, or the somehow /specially/ intellectually gifted in Gallifreyan society. I think I find the Doctor running away from a species-wide elitism more resonant? I want 'Come now, we're both Time Lords' to be a call to something more fundamental and significant than 'help a brother out, we both went to Eton.' My general squick's more complicated than that, but I'm not sure how to parse and articulate it. I just wholesale /prefer/ 'Time Lord' simply meaning Gallifreyan.
Spock's class status is revealed rather slowly--we learn that he's from a /very/ well-placed family only in second season's Amok Time when Kirk and McCoy notice that a reactionary Vulcan politician of interplanetary renown is officiating at Spock's wedding, and comment on it. Spock's in no position at that point to observe or react to their surprise. Later we meet a prominent Vulcan ambassador, and Kirk is surprised that the ambassador and his human wife are Spock's parents. It's interesting that Spock's human mother and Nurse Chapel both imply that for all the touted superiority of their emotional stoicism, Vulcans have some expectations of submissiveness from their wives that humans typically find sexist or strange. This isn't mentioned again in later encounters with the species, perhaps thought better of by later writers.
From a social sciences perspective, the dragging out the 'tortured half-breed' trope with Spock's a bit of a backward-looking step from a show that so wanted to be progressive.
As a parting non sequitur, I'm so, so tired of chasing bats out of the kitchen. This is like the fourth this summer? We have to be /doing/ something different to attract them, or their diminishing habitat is pushing them further into the city than I've ever seen. But screw environmental worries: damn bats! All up in my kitchen! Confounding the Schnoodle! ...I'm sorry, I have to go now and found a prog rock group, 'Confounding the Schnoodle.' Excuse me. I'll be back later. With Grammies.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-18 12:38 pm (UTC)i like this especially - I assume a vastly alien culture would appear uniform by virtue of the great differences that must exist between products of entirely disparate cultural origins.
interesting, though of course - not true, because most sci fi planets are populated by "basically humans".
no subject
Date: 2009-06-18 12:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-18 08:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-18 08:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-18 01:51 pm (UTC)Mostly this is my way of saying to that I associate Vulcans with Jews.
Mostly this is my way of saying to that I associate Vulcans with Jews.
AND IT TURNS OUT THAT I AM ACTUALLY WRITING KAVALIER AND CLAY. OOPS.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-18 08:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-18 02:25 pm (UTC)But the wife thing seems to point toward much more interesting things than the movie's "Let's poke fun at the half-breed!" Granted at least they made the attempt to put it in a
Vulcan context (you fail at being Vulcan!) But I could wish they'd gone for something more complex there. At least, a question of how being half-and-half would actually affect him? The show handled it with more panache 40 years ago...though I allow that it had about 70 hours more runtime than the movie.
Still, I've always been sad that in shows like Who and Trek that so often the alien cultures are not allowed to be as weird as they ought to be. You'd figure: alien culture, alien species, TOTALLY DIFFERENT, right? But 19 times out of 20, they're just funny-shaped humans (though I do recall a conversation in "Cat's Paw" where Spock commented on the alienness of beings from outside the galaxy compared to the general homey familiarity of our galaxy's civilizations...which is an interesting thought with interesting implications).
In Who, it's especially disappointing because he's an alien. But in New Who they've humanized him so much--human emotions, human reactions, apparently 99% of the time human biology and capabilities--that sometimes I find myself forgetting. At least in Old Who they kept him mysterious.
Still, re-watching old Trek delights me with far Out There they were willing to go back then compared to now. Given the lack of pop cultural sophistication at the time re: cultural awareness, it was impressive--sadly moreso than today, when we're supposedly more enlightened about embracing diversity, but apparently far less creative in our entertainment.
The whole "one planet, one culture" thing started to strike me as silly when I was fangirling Star Wars (where they took it as far as "one planet, one climate" but enough on that). At least in Trek, they give it enough thought to associate globalization with cultural evolution. Whether it's actually better, I don't know. The human diversity is still there, apparently. Uhura identifies as Bantu and speaks Swahili. Chekov, from his accent, speaks Russian. Sulu is a weird blend of Americanized Japanese (which seems prescient these days--but wasn't he adopted by American parents or something?). I've always wondered: do the nations still exist, or are they referring to them as regions under a world government? How is Earth arranged in the 23rd century?
And I suppose, in all fairness, they just didn't have time to devote to the cultural nuances of other species when the show was supposed to be about starship captains who were only going to be there for a few days.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-18 02:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-18 08:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-18 09:04 pm (UTC)Thus the quotation marks around naturally.
But I always saw the economic system as more socialist?
In Cloud Minders, or the show as a whole?
no subject
Date: 2009-06-18 09:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-18 09:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-18 02:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-18 08:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-18 08:09 pm (UTC)With Time Lords, I do consider their culture monolithic, but then I also think they're mostly congregated in the Citadel, and have been stagnant for millennia, so there's a reason for it. I never liked the Gallifreyan/Time Lord divide, either, especially in light of the new series - if that were true, the Doctor shouldn't just be lamenting the Time Lords. Besides, I like that 'Time sense' to be inherent; if they're automatically more in touch, more able to control it, they're more alien.
Besides, they are already people outside society, a different class - the Outsiders.
...Awww, bats! <3 /would probably not feels this way if she had to chase them out of the kitchen
There was a bit on Animal Planet where a bunch bats had decided to make an office building their new home. So...could be worse?
no subject
Date: 2009-06-18 09:04 pm (UTC)Or the opposition to things among humans (like Data's rights, or the Maquis) is /issue/ based, rather than part of a larger scope of trends/set of perspectives?
Gallifreyans I actually WANT to be monolithic or almost as a result of creepy Rassilonate cultural engineering, as BFAs like Zagreus or Omega sort of suggest took place. And I'm bit on the 'natural, non-technological ability to sense time' as well, for special-cool-timey-whimey points.
They're not at all bad, but my little siblings FREAK OUT about them, and it's shreiking at 3am and not fun.
...the office bat building is REALLY CUTE, though. :3
no subject
Date: 2009-06-19 05:24 pm (UTC)Exactly. I love, say, The High Ground? Where freedom fighting/terrorism is viewed from both sides, and there are no easy answers. But the cultural heritage of any character, how that would affect their opinions, never comes into play.
I definitely think Rassilon had a lot to do with it, which is marvellously fucked up. (I think technology and some biological engineering enhanced it, but that it was always there. Regeneration I'm not so sure about - maybe they took the natural potential and expounded on it? I definitely don't like the idea that you're awarded them upon graduating Academy, though.)
Clearly they need to learn to love the bats.
They just minded their own business, too! Lalala, flying over your head, don't mind me.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-20 04:15 pm (UTC)Yeah, I hate graduation-regeneration kiiind of a lot.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-20 04:34 pm (UTC)Yeeah. Especially since it'd mean the Doctor probably took Susan before she got any more regenerations, which - really? Doubt it.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-19 04:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-19 07:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-19 08:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-22 07:00 am (UTC)