I guess, damn. And yeah, Heidegger? Really? Phenomenology? If you say so...
Yeah, cultural applied linguistics can be AWESOME, but I'm not really /good/ at the mathy side of it. The problem with Sexualities is that I don't find Wilde a very interesting writer. I know that's Queer Blasphemy, but I feel like I've done him (joke about him not being v. interested in that here) and that he's a bit over-hyped. I'm not SUPER DRAWN to any one of these, problematically. :/
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
carisma_sensei
no subject
Date: 2010-08-22 05:05 pm (UTC)Yeah, cultural applied linguistics can be AWESOME, but I'm not really /good/ at the mathy side of it. The problem with Sexualities is that I don't find Wilde a very interesting writer. I know that's Queer Blasphemy, but I feel like I've done him (joke about him not being v. interested in that here) and that he's a bit over-hyped. I'm not SUPER DRAWN to any one of these, problematically. :/